Alexandra Hamilton is an attorney on the Leary Trial Team which handles complex cases involving injuries and death arising from construction and worksite conditions, defective products, dangerous property conditions, negligent security, and collisions between cars, trucks, pedestrians, and bicyclists.
Ms. Hamilton has been recognized as one of the top young litigators in California. She was named Top 40 Under 40 by the National Trial Lawyers Association, Top 10 Under 40 in California by the National Academy of Personal Injury Attorneys.
Ms. Hamilton graduated from Santa Clara University, School of Law. While at SCU, she interned in the Criminal Division of the United States Attorney’s Office, worked at two prestigious law firms, and studied in Istanbul, Turkey.
Prior to joining The Veen Firm in 2015, Ms. Hamilton worked at a prominent plaintiffs’ firm focusing on mass torts, personal injury, product liability, and other complex civil litigation. She brings the knowledge that she has developed over her career to passionately advocate for people suffering life-altering injuries.
When Ms. Hamilton is not helping clients, she loves to curl up with a good book and her beloved cat Andromache.
Education:
- Santa Clara University School of Law, Santa Clara, California, J.D.
- University of California, Santa Barbara, California, B.A.
Bar Admissions:
- California, 2011
Professional Associations and Memberships:
- American Association for Justice, Member
- Consumer Attorneys of California, Member
- ProVisors SFX, Executive Committee
- San Francisco Trial Lawyers Association, Member
- San Mateo County Trial Lawyers Association, Board of Directors
- San Mateo County Bar Association, Member
Cost
Rate : $$$
Terrible
ncompetence, disingenuous, and superficial are traits reflecting the Veen firm.
There’s a saying “all lawyers go to hell” and I never understood what that meant until my experience with the Veen firm. I was involved in a personal injury incident and my case was referred to the Veen firm from another lawyer in Sacramento.
I had signed a contingency-based contract with Elinor, the primary lawyer who would be representing me. Throughout the 3 years of representation, she was very much absent and my communications/interactions were mostly with her minions, Alexandra, Jennifer, and Alice. You would think they would inform Elinor or Elinor requesting to be updated but clearly me of that had occurred as I’ll go more into detail below.
Throughout my interactions with them, I would be doing most of the work providing them all the documentations from my health providers and more. It felt like I would have to initiate the engagements to get updates which was very frustrating. You don’t know what sleazy lawyers do and why their costs are so high because you have no viability and have to trust they’re doing their job with utmost competence.
The legal process is intense, exhausting, and broken. The Veen firm hardly prepared me, my family and friends, and witnesses of what to expect. Their was lack of communication from the Veen firm to them and the inconveniences they endured by the Veen firm reflects how terrible the firm operates.
The Veen firm legal team led by Elinor were outperformed and outmaneuvered by their defense counterparts in every way. What’s most embarrassed they were outclassed by a man who looks like a slimy car salesman. It felt like the defense team put more effort to representing the insurance company by researching my medical providers, social media, and etc. than mine which was disheartening because I should have followed my heart and fired Elinor and the Veen firm prior to trial.
Their strategy was a failure and they would not take my advice in further exposing the client’s destruction of evidence and lack of witnesses. If you hire attorneys to represent you, they should be open to listening to your suggestion. Clearly, they were fixed on their own way which had a disastrous result.
What was the nail in the coffin was finding out not one but TWO of my health providers whom the Veen firm used as witness had a felony and misdeamonor records the defense had brought up. HOW do you not do your research?! I had to find out in trial which left me completely demoralized. What was the Veen firm doing all this time?
Although we had a winning verdict, this whole ordeal was not worth it. The Veen firm hardly gave me any expert advice or guidance. Post-trial, they showed their true colors. I was clearly upset of their performance and more importantly, the service they provided. I had involved family friends who are sound lawyers and they asked the Veen firm tough questions which they could not answer. This is when the Veen firm showed their true colors. They should have done their work which was stipulated in the contract. They were more focused on expensing Starbucks coffee than doing actual research and work.
Because of the outcome of the case, I was filing for application of f arbitration on disputing their ridiculously high costs and fees. Fortunately, they had adjusted the costs and fees which indicates their incompetence and failure to provide the service that was disclosed on the contract we had signed.
I recommend those who are ever looking for representation (my heart goes out to you) to hold these opportunistic and superficial lawyers’s feet to the fire. Be sure you stay on top of them. Do NOT put your unconditional trust in them thinking they will look out for your best interest. They only look at their bottom line and see you as $$$.