Matthew Christian Muggeridge represents individuals in a broad range of areas including: criminal defense, immigration, family law, bankruptcy, and workers’ compensation.
He brings passion, determination and creativity to each case. Matt believes that every person’s case is as unique as they are.
When an individual’s livelihood, freedom, family, or future is at stake, each case demands the highest degree of professional commitment.
Cost
Rate : $$$
What types of cases Attorney Matthew Christian Muggeridge & FIDE Law, PLC Law Office Of Matthew Muggeridge can handle?
FIDE Law, PLC Law Office Of Matthew Muggeridge can handle cases related to laws concerning Immigration, Family, Criminal Defense, Bankruptcy, Employee Benefits. We manually verify each attorney’s practice areas before approving their profiles and reviews on our website.
Where is FIDE Law, PLC Law Office Of Matthew Muggeridge located?
FIDE Law, PLC Law Office Of Matthew Muggeridge is located at 2217 Princess Anne St b1, Fredericksburg, VA 22401, USA. You can reach out to FIDE Law, PLC Law Office Of Matthew Muggeridge using their phone line (540) 684-1766. You can also check their website mattmugglaw.com.
How much would it cost to hire FIDE Law, PLC Law Office Of Matthew Muggeridge?
Matthew Christian Muggeridge lawyer charges are specific to each case. However, they work with contingency fees and its ranges from $$ to $$$. They also provide free consultation [and no obligation quotes] if you are interested to hire.
Are Matthew Christian Muggeridge reviews trust-able?
We have the ratings and reviews moderation team who checks and verifies every review submitted on our website manually. You can trust all the reviews you see on Matthew Christian Muggeridge lawyer profile listing.
"Did a lawyer write this?" - Incompetent and Unethical
Seriously? Matthew Muggeridge should not be practicing law. A judge even chastised him when he wasn’t there, asking incredously, “Did a lawyer write this?” referring to the insufficient papers he had filed 7 months prior to that date. You see, he withdrew with NO notice which caused a delay of a child case that needed to be expedited and resulted in a split custody decision – I received sole legal of one child and the ex received sole legal of the other. Here’s my review of Matthew Muggeridge: The words that come to mind when describing FIDE Law are “incompetent” and “unethical” and “dirty tricks.” Certainly, lawyers use strategy and tactics to wage litigation but the “dirty tricks” are just a sign that they either don’t care or they allowed themselves to be swayed by their client’s delusions or vindictiveness. I just don’t know which is worse. Matthew Muggeridge pulled the “withdraw from litigation without providing ANY notice on the eve of trial dirty trick which I now know is what unethical lawyers do. Sure, we hear all about slimy lawyers, but the ones whose work impacts children should hold themselves to a higher standard. He didn’t even follow the court rules for noticing such motions. The divorce hearing was supposed to be less than 2 months later. On that court date, there was a NEW lawyer who argued for another delay (it went another YEAR!) and among other arguments, said that the divorce papers Muggeridge filed were basically “insufficient.” The Judge said, “Did a lawyer write this?” Yes, Muggeridge wrote the insufficient divorce papers and so he either doesn’t know how to practice law or he did so on purpose. He conducted NO discovery. He knew full well he was going to withdraw. Yes, I was played for a fool not having an attorney, but I played him too. I finally told him that I had been recording his calls to me in which he was trying to manipulate and coerce me – all in the name of representing his client’s vengeful plans – all of which constututed harm of my then-8-year-old child. Those phone calls had him eventually cursing at me when I started calling him out. He THOUGHT he was “sweet-talking” me . . . the foolish “gullible” mother had been recording HIM all along . . . coercing, cursing, lying, breaking various professional rules, and treating an opposing pro se litigant in an unprofessional manner. His litigation tactics delayed a divorce that needed to be expedited. Over that next year, my children, innocent victims in a hostile divorce, suffered various harms, some of which are LONG-LASTING. Matthew Muggeridge harmed my children through his litigation tactics and unethical behavior. We both know that he’s not incompetent . . just reckless and unfit to practice law. Don’t divorce in a vindictive way . . . your children will suffer. All kids are disaffected by divorce, of course, but Matthew Muggeridge’s tactics has brought SEVERE harm to one of my children and heartache to the other. Lawyers know that their professional standards require that they not participate in such litigation – he did anyway and then he bowed out just so his client could extend the separation and fortify his position. On the day he withdrew at a hearing which was supposed to be on another matter, he was still “negotiating” with me until he stood up and surprisingly asked to withdraw “due to ethical reasons.” Those ethical reasons were not just his client’s. I can’t believe he’s a GAL either. Plus, he was representing my ex-husband who was his friend. Matthew Muggeridge – you may want to scapegoat me and you know who I am . . . but YOU played a major role in the harm of my daughter. That divorce went on another year – to the end of December 2015 when the original hearing date was early January 2015. You harmed my child and some of the things that she has suffered might have lifelong consequences.
I wasn’t sure if I should post such a review which is not even the full story of his unethical behavior. I didn’t want to send irrational litigants his way to help them wage vindictive litigation but I think sharing the “withdraw from representing his/her client” dirty trick with anyone who reads this review was more important. Plus, I want him and others to know that his dirty tricks continue to harm my children. Don’t litigate vindictively – you won’t be able to control the consequences and there are some you can’t even imagine could happen to your children.
"Did a lawyer write this?" - Incompetent and Unethical
Seriously? Matthew Muggeridge should not be practicing law. A judge even chastised him when he wasn’t there, asking incredously, “Did a lawyer write this?” referring to the insufficient papers he had filed 7 months prior to that date. You see, he withdrew with NO notice which caused a delay of a child case that needed to be expedited and resulted in a split custody decision – I received sole legal of one child and the ex received sole legal of the other. Here’s my review of Matthew Muggeridge: The words that come to mind when describing FIDE Law are “incompetent” and “unethical” and “dirty tricks.” Certainly, lawyers use strategy and tactics to wage litigation but the “dirty tricks” are just a sign that they either don’t care or they allowed themselves to be swayed by their client’s delusions or vindictiveness. I just don’t know which is worse. Matthew Muggeridge pulled the “withdraw from litigation without providing ANY notice on the eve of trial dirty trick which I now know is what unethical lawyers do. Sure, we hear all about slimy lawyers, but the ones whose work impacts children should hold themselves to a higher standard. He didn’t even follow the court rules for noticing such motions. The divorce hearing was supposed to be less than 2 months later. On that court date, there was a NEW lawyer who argued for another delay (it went another YEAR!) and among other arguments, said that the divorce papers Muggeridge filed were basically “insufficient.” The Judge said, “Did a lawyer write this?” Yes, Muggeridge wrote the insufficient divorce papers and so he either doesn’t know how to practice law or he did so on purpose. He conducted NO discovery. He knew full well he was going to withdraw. Yes, I was played for a fool not having an attorney, but I played him too. I finally told him that I had been recording his calls to me in which he was trying to manipulate and coerce me – all in the name of representing his client’s vengeful plans – all of which constututed harm of my then-8-year-old child. Those phone calls had him eventually cursing at me when I started calling him out. He THOUGHT he was “sweet-talking” me . . . the foolish “gullible” mother had been recording HIM all along . . . coercing, cursing, lying, breaking various professional rules, and treating an opposing pro se litigant in an unprofessional manner. His litigation tactics delayed a divorce that needed to be expedited. Over that next year, my children, innocent victims in a hostile divorce, suffered various harms, some of which are LONG-LASTING. Matthew Muggeridge harmed my children through his litigation tactics and unethical behavior. We both know that he’s not incompetent . . just reckless and unfit to practice law. Don’t divorce in a vindictive way . . . your children will suffer. All kids are disaffected by divorce, of course, but Matthew Muggeridge’s tactics has brought SEVERE harm to one of my children and heartache to the other. Lawyers know that their professional standards require that they not participate in such litigation – he did anyway and then he bowed out just so his client could extend the separation and fortify his position. On the day he withdrew at a hearing which was supposed to be on another matter, he was still “negotiating” with me until he stood up and surprisingly asked to withdraw “due to ethical reasons.” Those ethical reasons were not just his client’s. I can’t believe he’s a GAL either. Plus, he was representing my ex-husband who was his friend. Matthew Muggeridge – you may want to scapegoat me and you know who I am . . . but YOU played a major role in the harm of my daughter. That divorce went on another year – to the end of December 2015 when the original hearing date was early January 2015. You harmed my child and some of the things that she has suffered might have lifelong consequences.
I wasn’t sure if I should post such a review which is not even the full story of his unethical behavior. I didn’t want to send irrational litigants his way to help them wage vindictive litigation but I think sharing the “withdraw from representing his/her client” dirty trick with anyone who reads this review was more important. Plus, I want him and others to know that his dirty tricks continue to harm my children. Don’t litigate vindictively – you won’t be able to control the consequences and there are some you can’t even imagine could happen to your children.